Getting My cheddite primers vs winchester 209 To Work

Getting My cheddite primers vs winchester 209 To Work

Blog Article

and have them tested for force and velocity to determine Whatever you're basically planning to get whenever you load them. Them, when they turn into suitable, load them precisely the way you did once you experienced them tested.



Simply because the Cheddite and Winchester primers are labeled 209 isn't going to necessarily mean they may be made use of interchangeably. The 209 usually means absolutely nothing with regards to the brisance or electric power in the primer.

My guess is often a slight reduction in powder would accomodate the differrences like changing lot# of powder untill load is founded,but I do not know for sure.

When you load the Cheddite primers always seal them with nail polish, they do not like dampness of any sort.

Jus imagined it was Remington/vista cutting corners. On the quality of the steel beng made use of. Receiving exact same marks over a dimensions learn. With Cheddite primers. Do not know why you are only having it with Winchester primers.

I have loaded Gain. 209s at the rear of Cheddite primers and had no problems. It might When you have reloaded the shells a lot of occasions but, around the 2nd and third loading I have found no problem.  

Hardly ever argue having an fool. They are going to only provide you down for their stage and defeat you with practical experience, George Carlin

I worked with laboratories For several years and I observed many mistakes. All good laboratories have stringent QA/QC suggestions which Otherwise strictly adhered to, will immediately invalidate data. I would like to see Precision's Licensed standards and calibration data for openers.

Insert to quote Only show this person #47 · Apr 25, 2021 Looks the OP has velocity limits imposed by his club. I advise taking his favored recipe and many shells loaded over and less than that load (data permitting) and possess the club examination them. That’s the only real range that’s pertinent to him in any case. When the OP wishes exterior assessments to verify data, he has to set “Downrange Wads” and “Precision Reloading” into his internet search engine and take a look at their ballistic tests provider. I’ve utilized PR and it’s relatively pain-free and fairly priced in case you deliver in more than one examination.

The load I'm working with isn't printed by Alliant, as they do not publish A great deal data for Remington hulls and Winchester primers. I did, nevertheless, electronic mail them, and they mentioned that with the stress the Rem primer/Rem hull the recipe calls for, they felt it was Protected. Here's the small print:

EDIT I just pulled the shell lifter out and took some measurements. It does appear like the deformation during the hulls fit the shape with the lifter. I will load and Check out some tomorrow to check out when there is a pattern to all of it. I can even deliver some samples to operate Monday and improve measurements.

Once i was seeking load data I'd called Ballistic Merchandise (where I got the primers from). They informed me in excess of the cellular phone which i could swap in a Cheddite primer for a W209 When the pressure was less than 10k PSI.

Incorporate to estimate Only clearly show this consumer #seven · Aug twenty five, 2017 Thanks Gentlemen for yourself responses. I used to be inquiring simply because I approach on striving Cheddite hulls with staball 6.5 load data their primers for many loads I am establishing. BT's comments over the difference between the CX1000 and CX2000 were vital since I have heard about variances involving cheddite when fired hulls utilizing the CX2000 vs.

"A properly regulated Militia, currently being necessary to the safety of the cost-free Point out, the correct with the men and women to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"